90Y PET/CT quantitative accuracy and image quality

90Y PET/CT quantitative accuracy and image quality
Wendy Siman1, 2, Osama R Mawlawi1, 2, Cheenu S Kappadath1, 2,
1The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
2The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.

Cite this article as: Siman W, Mawlawi O, Kappadath SC. 90Y PET/CT quantitative accuracy and image quality. Int J Cancer Ther Oncol 2014; 2(2):020235.

Conference Proceeding
[Presented at the Young Investigator’s Symposium at the 2014 Annual Meeting of Southwest Chapter of American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) in San Antonio, Texas, USA]


Purpose: To optimize 90Y-PET/CT image reconstruction for quantitative accuracy and optimal image quality.

Methods: PET/CT scans of a NEMA IEC phantom (3GBq 90YCl2, sphere uptake ratio of ~7) were acquired on 4 GE (BGO:DSTE, DST & LYSO:DRX, D690) and 1 Siemens (LSO:mCT) scanners in 3D list mode with 30 min/bed; replayed to 20, 15, 10 min/bed. Iterative reconstruction parameters explored were SUB × IT (3 – 80) and post-reconstruction filters: transaxial: 5 – 25 mm cutoff & z-axis (GE only): std vs. heavy. The effects of PSF modeling and TOF correction were evaluated for D690 and mCT. VOIs were drawn inside spheres and in adjacent background regions. The accuracy of sphere activity concentration (AC in kBq/mL) and contrast to noise ratio (CNR) was calculated as function of SUB × IT. Reconstructed PET images were also evaluated qualitatively for sphere detectability and artifacts.

Results: AC converged to 70 – 90% accuracy for 37 mm sphere and further degraded for smaller spheres. Spheres at max CNR might not reach AC convergence yet. Smaller spheres have slower convergence but reach CNR max together with other spheres. Scan duration did not strongly affect sphere convergence but shorter scans increased noise and reduced detectability; 13 mm spheres were not visible going from 30 to 15 min/bed. Heavy z-axis (GE) and transaxial filter with 10 – 15 mm cutoff helped suppress noise and increase sphere detectability at the expense of accuracy. Images with PSF+TOF corrections had higher sphere detectability and converged faster. Hot cluster artifacts 5 – 7 times the background were seen in some cases with SUB × IT near convergence and lower filtration.

Conclusion: Accurate 90Y AC was not achieved even at convergence and noise is a major concern. 90YPET/CT reconstruction parameters are different than those for 18F and benefit substantially from PSF+TOF corrections. Optimum image quality and accurate AC may not be simultaneously achievable.

Post-reconstruction filtration reduces noise and increase detectability in the expense of quantification accuracy and sharpness

Curves for 37 mm spheres and images are generated from GE DRX. 5mm and 11mm cutoff were used for OSEM reconstruction. The max CNR (A) occurs before convergence is achieved (B). Image (B) has higher noise and potentially lower detectability. Images (A) vs (C) show the effects of filtration.

Images with TOF correction have faster convergence and higher detectability

Spheres with TOF correction converge faster than non-TOF images. The quantitative accuracy at convergence, however, is not strongly affected. The curves shown above were calculated for the 37mm sphere. TOF corrections also improve detectability. The curves were calculated for GE D690. The images were reconstructed at 18 SUB×IT with 6.4mm filtration for D690 and 21 SUB×IT with 5mm filtration for mCT.

Received March 19, 2014; Published Online April 08, 2014

Presenting author: Courtney Bosse; Wendy Siman; The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Copyright © International Journal of Cancer Therapy and Oncology (IJCTO)

Comments on this article

View all comments

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.


International Journal of Cancer Therapy and Oncology (ISSN 2330-4049)

© International Journal of Cancer Therapy and Oncology (IJCTO)

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the 'ijcto.org' domain to your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.


Number of visits since October, 2013