Are output measurements always necessary after CT tube replacement?
Abstract
Purpose: TX regulations and the ACR require that CT radiation output be measured within 30 days of major service. The most common major service is tube replacement. We hypothesized that historical QC data could be used instead to determine if output measurements are necessary, reducing the need for costly output measurements.
Methods: We reviewed 66 records of tube replacements to determine with what frequency output falls outside specifications. We also conducted an experiment to verify that clinically significant output changes could be identified by comparing image noise in historical QC data with the same data after tube replacement. We used 30 days of historical QC data to establish a baseline noise level and 95% confidence interval (CI) for individual noise measurements. To simulate output changes, we acquired phantom images with our QC protocol while manually changing output (mA). We acquired 10 images using the baseline output and 10 images at each different “output”. We evaluated individual images and subsets of images at each “output” to determine if the system was within the manufacturer’s specifications.
Results: None of the 66 tube replacements resulted in an output change that exceeded specifications. Analysis of 30 days of historic QC data for our experimental system indicated a mean noise of 5.4 HU with 95% CI of 5.1 ‒ 5.7 HU. When using the mean noise of 10 images acquired at each of the varying outputs, we were able to identify, with 100% accuracy, images acquired at outputs outside manufacturer’s specifications.
Conclusion: The results of our review of historical tube replacement data indicated the likelihood of output falling outside manufacturer’s specifications is low. Considering this, it is likely that by using QC data from programs required by regulation and the ACR physicists can reliably verify radiation output stability remotely instead of making physical measurements.
--------------------
Cite this article as: P Stauduhar, A Jones. Are output measurements always necessary after CT tube replacement? Int J Cancer Ther Oncol 2014; 2(2):020238. DOI: 10.14319/ijcto.0202.38

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
International Journal of Cancer Therapy and Oncology (ISSN 2330-4049)
© International Journal of Cancer Therapy and Oncology (IJCTO)
To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the 'ijcto.org' domain to your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.
Comments on this article
"haiwon soon" (2018-03-05)
"haytham ali" (2018-03-24)
"alvina ash" (2018-07-02)
"TPE TEE" (2018-12-20)
"TPE TEE" (2018-12-20)
"TPE TEE" (2018-12-20)
"TPE TEE" (2018-12-20)
"Mrs Angelia Day" (2018-12-29)
"morgana souza sotopietra" (2019-01-29)
"morgana souza sotopietra" (2019-02-07)
"morgana souza sotopietra" (2019-03-20)
"Sari Silawati" (2019-05-31)
"Alex Tyler" (2019-06-25)