Email this article 
Post a Comment 
Microdosimetric characterisation of radiation fields for modelling tissue response in radiotherapy
Abstract
Purpose: Our overall goal is the development of an approach to model tissue response to radiotherapy in which a tissue is viewed as a statistical ensemble of interacting cells. This involves characterisation of radiation fields on the spatial scale of subcellular structures. On this scale, the spatial distribution of radiation energy imparted to tissue is highly non-uniform and should be characterised in statistical terms. Microdosimetry provides a formalism developed for that purpose. This study addresses limitations of the standard microdosimetric approach to modelling tissue response by introducing two new characteristics that include additional information in a form convenient for this application.
Methods: The standard microdosimetric approach is based on the concept of a sensitive volume (SV) representing a target volume in the cell. It is considered in isolation from other SVs, implying that energy depositions in different SVs are statistically independent and that individual cells respond to radiation independent of each other. In this study, we examined the latter approximation through analysis of correlation functions. All calculations were performed with Geant4-DNA Monte Carlo code.
Results: We found that for some realistic scenarios, spatial correlations of deposited energy can be significant. Two new characteristics of radiation fields are proposed. The first is the specific energy-volume histogram (zVH), which is a microscopic analogue of the dose-volume histogram. The second describes the probability distribution of deposited energies in two SVs without assuming statistical independence between the SVs. Numerical examples for protons and carbon ions of therapeutic energies are presented and discussed.
Conclusion: We extended the microdosimetric approach to modelling tissue response by including additional important characteristics and presented them in a more conventional radiotherapy format.
---------------------------------------------
Cite this article as: Wang H, Vassiliev ON. Microdosimetric characterisation of radiation fields for modelling tissue response in radiotherapy. Int J Cancer Ther Oncol 2014; 2(1):020116.
Keywords
References
Paganetti H, Schmitz T. The influence of the beam modulation technique on dose and RBE in proton radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol 1996; 41:1649-63.
Coutrakon G, Cortese J, Ghebremedhin A, et al. Microdosimetry spectra of the Loma Linda proton beam and relative biological effectiveness comparisons. Med Phys 1997; 24:1499-506.
Paganetti H, Olko P, Kobus H, et al. Calculation of relative biological effectiveness for proton beams using biological weighting functions. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997; 37:719-29.
Endo S, Tanaka K, Ishikawa M, et al. Microdosimetric evaluation of the 400 MeV/nucleon carbon beam at HIMAC. Med Phys 2005; 32:3843-8.
Nose H, Kase Y, Matsufuji N, Kanai T. Field size effect of radiation quality in carbon therapy using passive method. Med Phys 2009; 36:870-5.
Inaniwa T, Furukawa T, Kase Y, et al. Treatment planning for a scanned carbon beam with a modified microdosimetric kinetic model. Phys Med Biol 2010; 55:6721-37.
Martino G, Durante M, Schardt D. Microdosimetry measurements characterizing the radiation fields of 300 MeV/u 12C and 185 MeV/u 7Li pencil beams stopping in water. Phys Med Biol 2010; 55:3441-9.
Tsuda S, Sato T, Takahashi F, et al. Measurement of microdosimetric spectra with a wall-less tissue-equivalent proportional counter for a 290 MeV/u 12C beam. Phys Med Biol 2010; 55:5089-101.
Endo S, Tanaka K, Takada M, et al. Microdosimetric study for secondary neutrons in phantom produced by a 290 MeV/nucleon carbon beam. Med Phys 2007; 34:3571-8.
Wroe A, Rosenfeld A, Schulte R. Out-of-field dose equivalents delivered by proton therapy of prostate cancer. Med Phys 2007; 34:3449-56.
Yonai S, Kase Y, Matsufuji N, et al. Measurement of absorbed dose, quality factor, and dose equivalent in water phantom outside of the irradiation field in passive carbon-ion and proton radiotherapies. Med Phys 2010; 37:4046-55.
Wuu CS, Kliauga P, Zaider M, Amols HI. Microdosimetric evaluation of relative biological effectiveness for 103Pd, 125I, 241Am, and 192Ir brachytherapy sources. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1996; 36:689-97.
Taschereau R, Rene R, Pouliot J. Relative biological effectiveness enhancement of a 125I, brachytherapy seed with characteristic x rays from its constitutive materials. Med Phys 2002; 29:1397-02.
Reniers B, Vynckier S, Verhaegen F. Theoretical analysis of microdosimetric spectra and cluster formation for 103Pd and 125I photon emitters. Phys Med Biol 2004; 49:3781-95.
Zellmer DL, Almos HI. Microdosimetric single-event spectra for megavoltage electrons. Med Phys 1990; 17:596-01.
Okamoto H, Kohno T, Kanai T, et al. Microdosimetric study on influence of low energy photons on relative biological effectiveness under therapeutic conditions using 6 MV linac. Med Phys 2011; 38:4714-22.
Hawkins RB. A Microdosimetric-Kinetic model for the effect of non-Poisson distribution of lethal lesions on the variation of RBE with LET. Radiat Res 2003; 160:61-9.
Kase Y, Kanai T, Matsumoto Y, et al. Microdosimetric measurements and estimation of human cell survival for heavy-ion beams. Radiat Res 2006; 166:629-38.
Kase Y, Kanai T, Matsufuji N, et al. Biophysical calculation of cell survival probabilities using amorphous track structure models for heavy-ion irradiation. Phys Med Biol 2008; 53:37-59.
Hanin LG, Zaider M. Cell-survival probability at large doses: an alternative to the linear-quadratic model. Phys Med Biol 2010; 55:4687-702.
Vassiliev ON. Formulation of the multi-hit model with a non-Poisson distribution of hits. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012; 83:1311-16.
Lindborg L, Hultqvist M, Tedgren AC, Nikjoo H. Lineal energy and radiation quality in radiation therapy: model calculations and comparison with experiment. Phys Med Biol 2013; 58:3089-105.
Li XA, Alber M, Deasy JO, Jackson A, et al. The use and QA of biologically related models for treatment planning: Short report of the TG-166 of the therapy physics committee of the AAPM. Med Phys 2012; 39:1386-409.
Brenner DJ, Zaider M. Estimating RBEs at clinical doses from microdosimetric spectra. Med Phys 1998; 25:1055-57.
Pihet P, Menzel HG. Response to the Letter to the Editor "Estimating RBEs at clinical doses from microdosimetric spectra" [Med. Phys. 25, 1055 (1998)]. Med Phys 1999; 26:848-52.
Blyth BJ, Sykes PJ. Radiation-induced bystander effects: what are they, and how relevant are they to human radiation exposures? Radiat Res 2011; 176:139-57.
ICRU 1983 Microdosimetry ICRU Report 36 (Bethesda, MD: International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements)
Villagrasa C, Francis Z, Incerti S. Physical models implemented in the Geant4-DNA extension of the Geant4 toolkit for calculating initial radiation damage at the molecular level. Radiat Protect Dosim 2011; 143:214-18.
Dingfelder M, Inokuti M, Paretzke HG. Inelastic-collision cross sections of liquid water for interactions of energetic protons. Radiat Phys Chem 2000; 59:255-75.
Francis Z, Incerti S, Karamitros M, et al. Stopping power and ranges of electrons, protons and alpha particles in liquid water using the Geant4-DNA package. Nucl Instr Meth Phys Res B 2011; 269:2307-11.
Nikjoo H, Lindborg L. RBE of low energy electrons and photons. Phys Med Biol 2010; 55:R65-109.
Vassiliev ON, Rojdestvenski IV, Cottam MG. Quantum Monte-Carlo study of the Heisenberg chain with long-range ferromagnetic interactions. Physica A 2001; 294:139-54.
Vassiliev ON, Matsen MW. Fluctuation effects in block copolymer melts. J Chem Phys 2003; 118:7700-13.
Ziegler JF, Ziegler MD, Biersack JP. SRIM-the stopping and range of ions in matter (2010). Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B 2010; 268:1818-23.
Chmelevsky D, Kellerer AM. Computation of microdosimetric distributions for small sites. Radiat Environ Biophys 1977; 14:123-36.
Friedland W, Jacob P, Paretzke HG, Merzagora M, Ottolenghi A. Simulation of DNA fragment distributions after irradiation with photons. Radiat Environ Biophys 1999; 38:39-47.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14319/ijcto.0201.16
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
International Journal of Cancer Therapy and Oncology (ISSN 2330-4049)
© International Journal of Cancer Therapy and Oncology (IJCTO)
To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the 'ijcto.org' domain to your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.
Number of visits since October, 2013