Evaluation of a novel reference chamber “stealth chamber” through Monte Carlo simulations and experimental data

Luis Vazquez Quino, Claudia Huerta Hernandez, Oscar Calvo, Mark Deweese


Purpose: To evaluate a novel reference chamber (Stealth Chamber by IBA) through experimental data and Monte Carlo simulations for 6 and 15 MV photon energies.

Methods: Monte Carlo simulations in a water phantom for field sizes ranging from 3×3 and 25×25 cm2 were performed for both energies with and without the Monte Carlo model of the Stealth Chamber in the beam path, and compared to commissioning beam data. Percent depth doses (PDDs), profiles, and gamma analysis of the simulations were performed along with an energy spectrum analysis of the phase-space files generated during the simulation. Experimental data were acquired in water with IBA three-dimensional (3D) blue phantom in a set-up identical to the one used in the Monte Carlo simulations. PDD comparisons for fields ranging from 1×1 to 25×25 cm2 were performed for photon energies. Profile comparison for fields ranging from 1×1 to 25×25 cm2 were executed for the depths of dmax, 5, 10 and 20 cm. Criteria of 1%, 1 mm to compare PDDs and profiles were used. Transmission measurements with the Stealth Chamber and a Matrixx detector from IBA were investigated. Measurements for 6 and 15 MV with fields ranging from 3×3 to 25×25 cm2 dimensions were acquired in an open field with and without the Stealth Chamber in the path of the beam. Profiles and gamma analysis with a 1%, 1 mm gamma analysis criterion were performed.

Results: Monte Carlo simulations of the PDDs and profiles demonstrate the agreement between both simulations. Furthermore, the gamma analysis (1%, 1 mm) result of the comparison of both planes has 100% of the points passing the criteria. The spectral distribution analysis of the phase spaces for an open field with and without the chamber reveals the agreement between both simulations. Experimental measurements of PDDs and profiles have been conducted and reveal the comparability of relative dosimetric data acquired with the Stealth Chamber and our gold standard the CC13 chamber. Transmission data measured with an ion chamber array (Matrixx) showed the small attenuation caused by the use of the Stealth Chamber.

Conclusion: Simulations and experimental results from this investigation indicate the benefits associated with chamber positioning and time expended during the acquisition of the relative measurements of PDDs and profiles for the beam commissioning of photon beams when the Stealth Chamber is used as a reference chamber to perform these tasks. The results demonstrate that relative profiles and PDDs scanned with the Stealth Chamber in place are consistent with those made using a CC13 chamber within a 1% and 1 mm criterion.


Reference Chamber; Monte Carlo Simulations; Linac Commissioning; Ion Chamber

Full Text:



Das I, Cheng C, Watts R, et al. Accelerator beam data commissioning equipment and procedures: Report of the TG-106 of the Therapy Physics Committee of the AAPM. Med Phys 2008: 35, 4186-215.

Wuerfel JU. Dose measurements in small fields. Medical Physics International 2013; 1: 81-90.

Chetty I, Curran B, Cygler JE, et al. Issues associated with clinical implementation of Monte Carlo-based photon and electron external beam treatment planning. Med Phys 2007; 34:4818-52.

Vazquez-Quino LA, Massingill B, Shi C, et al. Monte Carlo modeling of a Novalis Tx Varian 6 MV with HD-120 multileaf collimator. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2012;13:3960.

Ahnesjo A. Collimator Scatter in Photon Therapy Beams. Med Phys 1995: 22: 267-78.

Ding G. Dose discrepancies between Monte Carlo calculations and measurements in the buildup region for a high-energy photon beam. Med Phys 2002; 29: 2459-63.

Ding GX, Duggan DM, Coffey CW. Commissioning stereotactic radiosurgery beams using both experimental and theoretical methods. Phys Med Biol 2006;51:2549-66.

Kijewski PK, Bjärngard BE, Petti PL. Monte Carlo calculations of scatter dose for small field sizes in a 60Co beam. Med Phys 1986;13:74-7.

Stathakis S, Esquivel C, Vazquez Quino L, et al. Accuracy of the Small Field Dosimetry Using the Acuros XB Dose Calculation Algorithm within and beyond Heterogeneous Media for 6 MV Photon Beams. International Journal of Medical Physics, Clinical Engineering and Radiation Oncology 2012;l:78-87.

Vazquez Quino L, Calvo O, Huerta C, et al. Monte Carlo simulations used to test the perturbation of a reference ion chamber prototype used for small fields. AAPM 2014 Annual Meeting (Poster), SU-E-T-242, 2014.


Belosi MF, Rodriguez M, Fogliata A, et al. Monte Carlo simulation of TrueBeam flattening-filter-free beams using varian phase-space files: comparison with experimental data. Med Phys 2014;41:051707.

Gete E, Duzenli C, Milette MP, et al. A Monte Carlo approach to validation of FFF VMAT treatment plans for the TrueBeam linac. Med Phys 2013;40:021707.

Bergman AM, Gete E, Duzenli C, Teke T. Monte Carlo modeling of HD120 multileaf collimator on Varian TrueBeam linear accelerator for verification of 6X and 6X FFF VMAT SABR treatment plans. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2014;15:4686.

Both JA, Pawlicki T. Monte Carlo Commissioning of Low Energy Electron Radiotherapy Beams using NXEGS Software. Int J Med Sci 2004; 1:63-75.

Craig J, Oliver M, Gladwish A, et al. Commissioning a fast Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for lung cancer treatment planning. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2008;9:2702.

Gagné IM, Zavgorodni S. Evaluation of the analytical anisotropic algorithm in an extreme water-lung interface phantom using Monte Carlo dose calculations. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2006;8:33-46.

Kawrakow I, Walters BR. Efficient photon beam dose calculations using DOSXYZnrc with BEAMnrc. Med Phys 2006;33:3046-56.

Verhaegen F, Seuntjens J. Monte Carlo modelling of external radiotherapy photon beams. Phys Med Biol 2003; 48:R107-64.

Rogers DW, Faddegon BA, Ding GX, Ma CM, We J, Mackie TR. BEAM: a Monte Carlo code to simulate radiotherapy treatment units. Med Phys 1995;22:503-24.

Mora GM, Maio A, Rogers DW. Monte Carlo simulation of a typical 60Co therapy source. Med Phys 1999; 26:2494-502.

Kawrakow I. On the efficiency of photon beam treatment head simulations. Med Phys 2005;32:2320-26.

Kawrakow I. On the de-noising of Monte Carlo calculated dose distributions. Phys Med Biol 2002;47:3087-103.

Kry SF, Titt U, Pönisch F, Followill D, et al. A Monte Carlo model for calculating out-of-field dose from a varian 6 MV beam. Med Phys 2006;33:4405-13.

Hasenbalg F, Fix MK, Born EJ, Mini R, Kawrakow I. VMC++ versus BEAMnrc: a comparison of simulated linear accelerator heads for photon beams. Med Phys 2008;35:1521-31.

Faddegon BA, Asai M, Perl J, et al. Benchmarking of Monte Carlo simulation of bremsstrahlung from thick targets at radiotherapy energies. Med Phys 2008;35:4308-17.

Fragoso M, Kawrakow I, Faddegon BA, et al. Fast, accurate photon beam accelerator modeling using BEAMnrc: a systematic investigation of efficiency enhancing methods and cross-section data. Med Phys 2009;36:5451-66.

Borges C, Zarza-Moreno M, Heath E, et al. Monte Carlo modeling and simulations of the High Definition (HD-120) micro MLC and validation against measurements for a 6 MV beam. Med Phys 2012;39:415-23.

Fix MK, Volken W, Frei D, et al. Monte Carlo implementation, and characterization of a 120 leaf MLC. Med Phys 2011;38:5311-20.

Gersh J, Stereotactic beam characterization using the IBA stealth chamber reference detector. IBA Dosimetry Whitepaper 2014.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14319/ijcto.32.22

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.


International Journal of Cancer Therapy and Oncology (ISSN 2330-4049)

© International Journal of Cancer Therapy and Oncology (IJCTO)

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the 'ijcto.org' domain to your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.


Number of visits since October, 2013