The value of Gleason score and prostate-specific antigen level in predicting the need for a baseline nuclear bone scan in patients with newly diagnosed 84 prostate cancer cases

Hind Chorfi, Nadia Ismaili Alaoui

Abstract


Purpose: The objective of the present study was to correlate the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level and Gleason score with the baseline bone scan results in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer and try to determine a group of patients whose risk of bone metastases is low enough to omit safely this staging modality.

Methods: This retrospective study included 84 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer (Pca) who underwent a staging bone scan in Nuclear Medicine department between August 2013 and August 2014. Data were collected on age, bony pain, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level and Gleason score, then, bone scan results were analyzed with respect to these parameters. Bone scan was recorded as positive, negative or equivocal. In case of equivocal lesions, a single-photon emission computed tomography combined with computed tomography (SPECT-CT) was performed allowing a better morphological precision.

Results: The median age of the patients was 71, 38 years. Bone metastases were detected in 41 patients (49% of cases), bony pain was a reliable presenting sign of skeletal involvement. Both prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level and Gleason score were independent predictors of positive bone scan. However, the combination of these two parameters enhanced predictability of bone scan results. According to this study, the risk to develop a bone metastasis was very low in asymptomatic patients with PSA level < 20 ng/ml irrespective of the Gleason score or with PSA level < 30 ng/ml associated to a Gleason score < 7.

Conclusion: The present study discourages the routine use of bone scan as a pre-treatment staging modality in asymptomatic patients with PSA level < 20 ng/ml irrespective of the Gleason score or with PSA level < 30 ng/ml associated to a Gleason score < 7, allowing considerable cost savings and decreasing time from diagnosis to treatment.


Keywords


Prostate Cancer; PSA level; Gleason Score; Bone Scan

Full Text:

PDF

References


Beheshti M, Langsteger W, Fogelman I. Prostate cancer: role of SPECT and PET in imaging bone metastases. Semin Nucl Med. 2009;39:396-407.

Lebret T, Méjean A. Physiopathology, diagnosis and management of bone metastases from prostate cancer. Prog Urol. 2008;18 Suppl 7:S349-56.

Ritenour CW, Abbott JT, Goodman M, et al. The utilization of Gleason grade as the primary criterion for ordering nuclear bone scan in newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients. ScientificWorldJournal. 2009;9:1040-5.

McArthur C, McLaughlin G, Meddings RN. Changing the referral criteria for bone scan in newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients. Br J Radiol. 2012;85:390-4.

Zacho HD, Barsi T, Mortensen JC, et al. Prospective multicenter study of bone scintigraphy in consecutive patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer. Clin Nucl Med. 2014;39:26-31.

Mottet N, Bastian PJ, Bellmunt J, et al. Guidelines on prostate cancer. European Association of Urology 2014.

Abuzallouf S, Dayes I, Lukka H. Baseline staging of newly diagnosed prostate cancer: a summary of the literature. J Urol. 2004;171:2122-7.

Briganti A, Passoni N, Ferrari M, et al. When to perform bone scan in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer: external validation of the currently available guidelines and proposal of a novel risk stratification tool. Eur Urol. 2010; 57:551-8.

Chybowski FM, Keller JJ, Bergstralh EJ, Oesterling JE. Predicting radionuclide bone scan findings in patients with newly diagnosed, untreated prostate cancer: prostate specific antigen is superior to all other clinical parameters. J Urol. 1991;145:313-8.

Gleave ME, Coupland D, Drachenberg D, et al. Ability of serum prostate-specific antigen levels to predict normal bone scans in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer. Urology 1996; 47: 708-12.

Lai MH, Luk WH, Chan JC. Predicting bone scan findings using sPSA in patients newly diagnosed of prostate cancer: feasibility in Asian population. Urol Oncol. 2011;29:275-9.

Hirobe M, Takahashi A, Hisasue S, et al. Bone scanning--who needs it among patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer? Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2007; 37:788-92.

Kosuda S, Yoshimura I, Aizawa T, et al. Can initial prostate specific antigen determinations eliminate the need for bone scans in patients with newly diagnosed prostate carcinoma? A multicenter retrospective study in Japan. Cancer. 2002;94:964-72.

Wymenga LF, Boomsma JH, Groenier K, et al. Routine bone scans in patients with prostate cancer related to serum prostate-specific antigen and alkaline phosphatase. BJU Int. 2001;88:226-30.

Al-Ghazo MA, Ghalayini IF, Al-Azab RS, et al. Do all patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer need staging radionuclide bone scan? A retrospective study. Int Braz J Urol. 2010; 36:685-91; discussion 691-2.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14319/ijcto.33.16

Comments on this article

View all comments


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

------------------------------------------------------------

International Journal of Cancer Therapy and Oncology (ISSN 2330-4049)

© International Journal of Cancer Therapy and Oncology (IJCTO)

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the 'ijcto.org' domain to your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.

------------------------------------------------------------

Number of visits since October, 2013
AmazingCounters.com