A method for an external quality audit programme in radiosurgery with TLDs and radiochromic film

Luciana Tourinho Campos, Carmén Sandra Guzmán Calcina, Victor Alves Gabriel Leandro Alves, Adelaide Almeida, Carlos Eduardo de Almeida


Purpose: Radiosurgery is a high-precision technique that delivers a single highly conformed dose to a stereotactically localized target in most cases. This study proposes a simple and reliable postal quality assurance (QA) phantom for use in an independent evaluation.

Methods: Two important parameters were verified, including the dosimetric precision of the treatment planning system, by comparing the absorbed dose measured in the target volume using different dosimeters (i.e., radiochromic film and thermoluminescence dosimeters) calibrated against a small volume ion chamber. The head phantom and the instruction sheets were extensively tested and sent by mail to selected institutions. The institutions were chosen according to the type of linear accelerator they had. The three institutions chosen had different radiosurgery systems for the delivery of treatment and the planning system. The objective was to understand whether our system would be applicable to different radiosurgery delivery systems.

Results: A comparison between the TPS plan and the measurement plan using the radiochromic film showed that the gamma pass rate was more than 90% for a gamma criteria of 2 mm/2%. In the worst case scenario, the disagreement with TLD measurements at position 1 arose because the highest dose gradient occurred in that region. The other positions measured with thermoluminescence dosimeters (TLDs) varied by less than 3% from the calculated dose.

Conclusion: The overall results were very encouraging and suggest that the proposed phantom may be used as a postal system as part of an independent QA tool for radiosurgery.


Radiosurgery, Quality control, Postal system


Khan FM. The Physics of Radiation Therapy, 4th Edition. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: 2010.

Warrington AP, Laing RW, Brada M. Quality assurance in fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 1994;30(3):239-46.

Kehoe T, Rugg LJ. From technical quality assurance of radiotherapy to a comprehensive quality of service management system. Radiother Oncol. 1999;51(3):281-90.

Johansson KA, Nilsson P, Zackrisson B, et al. The quality assurance process for the ARTSCAN head and neck study – A practical interactive approach for quality assurance in 3DCRT and IMRT. Radiother Oncol. 2008;87(2):290-9.

Kroutilı́ková D, Novotný J, Judas L. Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD) quality assurance network in the Czech Republic. Radiother Oncol. 2003;66(2):235-44.

Schell MC, Bova FJ, Larson DA, et al. Stereotactic Radiosurgery: Report of the TG-42 of the Therapy Physics Committee of the AAPM. 1995.

Luxton G, Petrovich Z, Jozsef G, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery: principles and comparison of treatment methods. Neurosurgery. 1993;32(2):241-59.

Almeida CE, Affonseca M, Calcina CSG, et al. Rastreabilidade das referências metrológicas em dose absorvida na água do Programa de Qualidade em Dosimetria. Radiol Bras. 2005;38(3):205-8.

Derreumaux S, Etard C, Huet C, et al. Lessons from recent accidents in radiation therapy in France. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2008;131(1):130-5.

Kaal EC, Niël CG, Vecht CJ. Therapeutic management of brain metastasis. Lancet Neurol. 2005;4(5):289-98.

Schlegel W, Bortfeld T, Grosu A. New technologies in Radiation Oncology. Berlin Heidelberg: SpringereVerlag. 2006.

Ertl A, Berg A, Zehetmayer M, et al. High-resolution studies based on MR imaging with polymer BANGe gels in stereotactic radiation techniques. Magn Reson Imaging. 2000;18(3):343-9.

Ramani R, Ketko MG, O’Brien PF, et al. A QA phantom for dynamic stereotactic radiosurgery: quantitative measurements. Med Phys. 1995;22(8):1343-6.

Mack A, Wolff R, Weltz D, et al. Experimentally determined three-dimensional dose distributions in small complex targets. J Neurosurg. 2002;97(5):551-5.

Mack A, Scheib SG, Riecker M, et al. A system for quality assurance in radiosurgery. Radiosurgery. 2004;4:236-46.

Barbosa NA, da Rosa LA, Batista CV, et al. Development of a phantom for dose distribution verification in Stereotactic Radiosurgery. Phys Med. 2013;29(5):461-9.

Novotný Jr J, Dvorák P, Spevá cek V, et al. Quality control of the stereotactic radiosurgery procedure with the polymer-gel dosimetry. Radiother Oncol. 2002;63(2):223-30.

Programa de Qualidade em Radioterapia, Instituto Nacional do Câncer, Retrieved December, 10, 2016.

Laub WU, Wong T. The volume effect of detectors in the dosimetry of small fields used in IMRT. Med Phys. 2003;30(3):341-7.

Duggan DM, Coffey CW. Small photon field dosimetry for stereotactic radiosurgery. Med Dosim. 1998; 23(3):153-9.

Calcina CSG, Oliveira LN, de Almeida CE, et al. Dosimetric parameters for small field sizes using Fricke Xylenol gel, thermoluminescent, film dosimeters and an ionization chamber. Phys Med Biol. 2007;52(5):1431-39.

Bilski P, Waligórski MPR, Budzanowski M, et al. Miniature thermoluminescent detectors for dosimetry in radiotherapy. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2002;101:473-6.

Niroomand-Rad A, Blackwell CR, Coursey BM, et al. Radiochromic film dosimetry: recommendations of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 55. American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Med Phys. 1998;25(11):2093-115.

Meigooni AS, Sanders MF, IbbotGS, et al. Dosimetric characteristics of an improved radiochromic film. Med Phys. 1996;23(11):1883-8.

Devic S, Tomic N, Lewis D. Reference radiochromic film dosimetry: Review of technical aspects. Phys Med. 2016;32(4):541-56.

Dieterich S, Cavedon C, Chuang CF, et al. Quality assurance for robotic radiosurgery. Report of TG-135 of the Therapy Physics Committee of the AAPM. 2011.

American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM), Stereotactic Radiosurgery, American Institute of Physics, 1995, Report 54, INC, New York.

Zhang M, Zhang Q, Gan h, et al. Setup uncertainties in linear accelerator based stereotactic radiosurgery and a derivation of the corresponding setup margin for treatment planning. Phys Med. 2016;32(2)379-85.

International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Standardized quality audit procedures for on-site dosimetry visits to radiotherapy hospitals. 1999.

Li H, Dong L, Zhang L, et al. Toward better understanding of the gamma index: investigation of parameters with a surface-based distance method. Med Phys. 2011;38(12):6730-41.

Nelms BE, Chan MF, Jarry G, et al. Evaluating IMRT and VMAT dose accuracy: practical examples of failure to detect systematic errors when applying a commonly used metric and action levels. Med Phys. 2013;40(11):111722.

Seravalli E, van Haaren PM, van der Toorn PP, et al. A comprehensive evaluation of treatment accuracy, including end-to-end test and clinical data, applied to intracranial stereotactic radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2015;116(1):131-8.

Tachibana H, Takahashi R. Quantitative analysis of geometric information from an end-to-end examination of IMRT and VMAT using the optimal selection method. Med Phys. 2013;40(6):061709.

Hu W, Graff P, Boettger T, et al. A spatially encoded dose difference maximal intensity projection map for patient dose evaluation: a new first line patient quality assurance tool. Med Phys. 2011;38(4):1748-53.

Zhen H, Nelms BE, Tome WA. Moving from gamma passing rates to patient DVH-based QA metrics in pretreatment dose QA. Med Phys. 2011;38(10):5477-89.

Pulliam KB, Huang JY, Howell RM, et al. Comparison of 2D and 3D gamma analyses. Med Phys. 2014;41(2):021710.

Blanck O, Masi L, Damme MC, et al. Film-based delivery quality assurance for robotic radiosurgery: Commissioning and validation. Phys Med. 2015;31(5)476-83.

Shaw E, Kline R, Gillin M, et al. Radiation therapy oncology group: Radiosurgery quality assurance guidelines. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1993;27(5):1231-9.

Derreumaux S, Chavaudra J, Bridier A, et al. A european quality assurance network for radiotherapy: dose measurement procedure. Phys Med Biol. 1995;40(7):1191-208.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14319/ijcto.61.2

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.


International Journal of Cancer Therapy and Oncology (ISSN 2330-4049)

© International Journal of Cancer Therapy and Oncology (IJCTO)

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the 'ijcto.org' domain to your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.


Number of visits since October, 2013