Evaluation of ArcCHECK SNC Machine QA tool for Modern Linear Accelerator

Vaibhav R Mhatre, Parimal Patwe


Purpose: ArcCHECK SNC Machine QA tool is used to test geometric and delivery aspects of linear accelerator.

Methods: In this study we evaluated the performance of this tool. For each item analyzed by the tool, wherever possible, tests across the same time period using portal dosimetry were also evaluated. Machine QA feature allows user to perform quality assurance tests using ArcCHECK phantom. Following tests can be performed 1) Gantry Speed, Rotation and Angle 2) MLC/Collimator 3) Beam Profile Flatness and Symmetry. Data was collected on true BEAM STx for a year. All plans were created for 6 and 10 MV beams as per the SNC patient user manual in Eclipse v.13.

Results: The Gantry speed was 3.9 deg/sec with speed maximum deviation around 0.3 deg/sec. The Gantry Isocenter for arc delivery was 0.9 mm and static delivery was 0.4 mm which was well consistent with MPC (0.4 mm). The average maximum percent positive and negative diff was found to be 1.9%, -0.25% and average maximum distance positive and negative diff was 0.4 mm, -0.3 mm for MLC/Collimator QA. The average gamma error at 1% 1 mm criteria was 1.4% using portal Dosimetry for 6 MV. The Flatness for Arc delivery was 1.8% and Symmetry for Y was 0.8% and X was 1.8%.

Conclusion: ArcCHECK SNC Machine QA tool is useful for quality assurance of modern linear accelerators as it tests both geometric and delivery aspects. This test can be incorporated in the regular quality assurance protocol for VMAT delivery.


Machine QA, VMAT, ArcCHECK

Full Text:



Klein EE, Hanley J, Bayouth J, et al. Task Group 142 report: Quality assurance of medical accelerators, Med Phys. 200936:4197–212

Medical electron accelerators-functional performance characteristics. International Electro technical Commission Publication 976. 1989.

Physical aspects of quality assurance in radiation therapy. American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group Report 13 _American Institute of Physics, New York. 1984.

Otto K. Volumetric modulated arc therapy: IMRT in a single gantry arc. Med Phys. 2008;35(1):310–17.

Van Esch A, Huyskens D, Behrens C, et al. Implementing Rapid Arc into clinical routine: comprehensive program from machine QA to TPS validation and patient QA. Med Phys. 2011;38(9):5146–66.

Ling CC, Zhang P, Archambault Y, et al. Commissioning and quality assurance of RapidArc radiotherapy delivery system. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;72(2):575–81 .

Bedford JL and Warrington AP. Commissioning of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;73(2):537–45.

Palma D, Vollans E, James K, et al. Volumetric modulated arc therapy for delivery of prostate radiotherapy: comparison with intensity-modulated radiotherapy and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;72(4):996–1001.

Thiyagarajan R, Nambiraj A, Sinha SN, et al. Analyzing the performance of ArcCHECK diode array detector for VMAT plan. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2016;21(1):50-6.

Chaswal V, Weldon M, Gupta N, et al. Commissioning and comprehensive evaluation of the ArcCHECK cylindrical diode array for VMAT pretreatment delivery QA. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014;15(4):212–25.

Netherlands Commission on Radiation Dosimetry. Report 24: code of practice for the quality assurance control for volumetric modulated arc therapy. Delft: NCS. 2015.

Clivio A, Vanetti E, Rose S, et al. Evaluation of the Machine Performance Check application for TrueBeam Linac. Radiat Oncol. 2015;10:97.

Chang L, Ho SY, Du YC, et al. An improved method to accurately calibrate the gantry angle indica¬tors of the radiotherapy linear accelerators. NuclInstrum Meth A. 2007;576(2-3):441–5.

Chang L, Ho SY, Wu JM, et al. Technical innovation to calibrate the gantry angle indicators of linear accelerators. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2001;2(1):54–8.

Rowshanfarzad P, Sabet M, O’Connor DJ, et al. Gantry angle determination during arc IMRT: evaluation of a simple EPID-based technique and two commercial inclinometers. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2012;13(6):203–14.

Low DA, Zhu XR, Purdy JA, et al. The influence of angular misalignment on fixed-portal intensity modulated radiation therapy. Med Phys. 1997;24:1123–39.

Xing L, Lin ZX, Donaldson SS, et al. Boyer, Dosimetric effects of patient displacement and collimator and gantry angle misalignment on intensity modulated radiation therapy. Radiother Oncol. 2000;56:97–108.

Oliver M, Bush K, Zavgorodni S, et al. Understanding the impact of RapidArc therapy delivery errors for prostate cancer. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2011;12:32–43.

Tang G, Earl MA, and Yu CX. Variable dose rate single-arc IMAT delivered with constant dose rate and variable angular spacing. Phys Med Biol. 2009;54:6439–56.

Rowshanfarzad et al. An EPID-based method for comprehensive verification of gantry, EPID and the MLC carriage positional accuracy in Varian linacs during arc treatments. Radiat Oncol. 2014;9:249.

LoSasso T, Chui CS, Ling CC. Physical and dosimetric aspects of a multileaf collimation system used in the dynamic mode for implementing intensity modulated radiotherapy. Med Phys. 1998;25(10):1919–27.

Cadman P, McNutt T, Bzdusek K. Validation of physics improvements for IMRT with a commercial treatment-planning system. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2005;6:74–86.

Joy S, Starkschall G, Kry S, et al. Dosimetric effects of jaw tracking in step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2012;13(2):136–45.

Schmidhalter D, Fix MK, Niederer P, et al. Leaf transmission reduction using moving jaws for dynamic MLC IMRT. Med Phys. 2007;34(9):3674–87.

Kim JI, Park JM, Park SY, et al. Assessment of potential jaw-tracking advantage using control point sequences of VMAT planning. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014;15:160–8.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14319/ijcto.51.11

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.


International Journal of Cancer Therapy and Oncology (ISSN 2330-4049)

© International Journal of Cancer Therapy and Oncology (IJCTO)

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the 'ijcto.org' domain to your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.


Number of visits since October, 2013