Stability assessment of radiation isocenter with the gimbaled linac system

Hideharu Miura, Shuichi Ozawa, Shintaro Tsuda, Kiyoshi Yamada, Yasushi Nagata


Purpose: We report the results of our year-long radiation isocenter accuracy verification for daily quality assurance (QA) implementation on a Vero4DRT system.

Methods: The radiation isocenter was calculated using a cube phantom with a steel ball of diameter 10 mm fixed to the center of the phantom. A single photon beam was set with a field size of 100 × 100 mm2. Coincidence of the centroid of the steel ball at kiloVolt X-ray imaging isocenter and megaVolt beam radiation isocenter at each gantry and ring angle was tested. This procedure was performed for gantry angles of 0°, 90°, 180°, and 270°, and ring angles of 0°, 20°, and 340°. The centroid of the steel ball and the center of the radiation field were calculated to analyze the radiation isocenter error. This analysis was automatically calculated using the Daily Check tool in the Vero4DRT system. This QA was implemented between 24 August 2015 and 23 August 2016.

Results: The average and standard deviation for pan and tilt directions were 0.12 ± 0.10 mm and -0.20 ± 0.13 mm, respectively. The maximum radiation isocenter accuracy error was 0.50 mm in both directions.

Conclusion: The radiation isocenter alignment for the one year duration of the experiment was performed with high accuracy.


Isocenter accuracy verification, Quality assurance, Vero4DRT, Electronic portal image device

Full Text:



Klein EE, Hanley J, Bayouth J, et al. Task Group 142 Report: Quality assurance of medical accelerators. Med Phys. 2009;36:4197–212.

Lutz W, Winston KR, Maleki N. A system for stereotactic radiosurgery with a linear accelerator. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1988;14:373–81.

Miyabe Y, Sawada A, Takayama K, et al. Positioning accuracy of a new image-guided radiotherapy system. Med Phys. 2011;38:2535-41.

Kamomae T, Monzen H, Nakayama S, et al. Accuracy of image guidance using free-breathing cone-beam computed tomography for stereotactic lung radiotherapy. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0126152.

Kamino Y, Takayama K, Kokubo M, et al. Development of a four-dimensional image-guided radiotherapy system with a gimbaled X-ray head. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;66:271-8.

Nakamura M, Sawada A, Ishihara Y, et al. Dosimetric characterization of a multileaf collimator for a new four-dimensional image-guided radiotherapy system with a gimbaled x-ray head, MHI-TM2000. Med Phys. 2010;37:4684-91.

Du W, Gao S, Wang X, et al. Quantifying the gantry sag on linear accelerators and introducing an MLC-based compensation strategy. Med Phys. 2012;39:2156-62.

Miura H, Ozawa S, Tsuda S, et al. Quality assurance for dynamic tumor tracking using the Vero4DRT system. Int J Cancer Ther Oncol. 2016;4(1):4112.

Miura H, Ozawa S, Hayata M, et al. Simple quality assurance method of dynamic tumor tracking with the gimbaled linac system using a light field. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016;17:177–183.

Miura H, Ozawa S, Enosaki T, et al. Quality assurance of a gimbaled head swing verification using feature point tracking. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017;18:49–52.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.


International Journal of Cancer Therapy and Oncology (ISSN 2330-4049)

© International Journal of Cancer Therapy and Oncology (IJCTO)

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the '' domain to your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.


Number of visits since October, 2013